I agree with the article’s conclusion, and am happy for the
associates, but what about their less well placed colleagues, contract
attorneys? The threat for survival that
contract attorneys face comes not just from predictive coding but from law
schools that spill new graduates like a broken faucet, as well as from
employers that take advantage of the situation by offering unscrupulously low
wages knowing that for every position they have, there are several applicants
willing to fill it at almost any rate or cost.
So, is there still a place for contract attorneys? Will predictive coding and the deluge of law
school graduates wipe out their positions, or depress their value to the point
where the attorneys would make more money working at McDonalds? I hope the answer is no, and the answer should
be no if the legal community takes a moment to realize they need to treat
contract attorneys like the nonfungible
assets they can be, rather than as pariahs who are undeserving of earning even
$20 an hour.
Despite their persona non grata reputation, a quality contract
attorney is worth their weight in gold, and the legal industry should do
everything it can to ensure they do not go the way of the dodo, whether because
of technology, wages, or anything else. Contract
attorneys’ hands-on expertise and knowledge of review platforms and software
can add great efficiency and effectiveness to a project. Their in-depth familiarity with the documents
and details of a case can be illuminating, and their understanding of the
eDiscovery process can be a difference maker.
The truly good contract attorneys are knowledgeable experts that can be
leveraged to your advantage and provide valuable input and consultation to your
case and how you prepare for it. More
than hired mercenaries whose goal it is to plow through data as quickly as
possible, contract attorneys can be your eyes and ears in the data.
At the end of the day, you get what you pay for, and nowhere
is that more true than with contract attorneys.
You may be able to fill positions offering wages as low as $15 an hour,
but that will not get you much more than a warm body. With such a low rate of pay, a contract
attorney will have every incentive to look everywhere and anywhere for a
different job. They will lack quality,
consistency, motivation, and loyalty, resulting in a poor quality review, even
if cheap.
Alternatively, as with most positions in life, the more
faith and responsibility you show contract attorneys (along with paying them a
decent wage for someone with a law degree) the more you obtain from them and
the more value they will add to your case.
I urge you to look beyond the mere number efficiencies technology such
as predictive coding can provide, to look beyond the hourly rate you are paying,
and to focus instead on the intangible values added to your overall case. That is where you find the true value and
worth of your contract attorneys, and where you will find, if utilized properly,
the good ones are invaluable and indispensible.
Do not get me wrong, I am not suggesting that you should forgo the use
technology or that you should be offering your contract attorneys partner level
compensation. I am simply saying that
technology should be used to supplement and enhance your contract attorneys’
value and capabilities, not replace them.
Despite advances in technology, the human element of
eDiscovery remains more vital and important than ever. A key component of this human element is the
contract attorney. Even with the advance
of predictive coding and like technologies, skilled contract attorneys should
continue to be valuable commodities undeserving of a place on any endangered
list.
What a good blog you have here. Pleas e update it more often. This topics is my interest. Thank you. . . bp claims
ReplyDelete